Rolling Out GPS Tracking Without Losing Your Team's Trust
Location tracking can improve accountability and safety—but it can also backfire. This guide covers the privacy policies, communication strategies, and technical settings that make the difference.
GPS tracking can transform your operations—or destroy team morale. The difference comes down to how you roll it out.
Most GPS tracking failures are human, not technical. Be transparent about what's tracked and why. Use data for safety and accountability—not micromanagement. Roll out carefully: announce early, pilot with volunteers, train supervisors first.
Why Location Tracking Fails
Most problems with GPS tracking aren't technical. They're human. Guards feel surveilled. Supervisors use the data punitively. Trust breaks down. The technology works fine—the implementation doesn't.
Before you flip the switch, you need to answer some hard questions: Why are you tracking? What will you do with the data? Who has access? What happens when someone's location doesn't match expectations?
The Privacy Conversation
Your guards deserve to know exactly what's being tracked and why. Vague policies create suspicion. Be specific:
Clear Privacy Policy Must Include
- Location is tracked only during scheduled shifts
- Data is used for safety and accountability, not micromanagement
- Historical location data is retained for [X] days
- Only supervisors and dispatchers have access
Put it in writing. Make it part of onboarding. Answer questions honestly. The goal is informed consent, not grudging compliance.
Technical Settings That Matter
How you configure tracking affects both accuracy and battery life:
- Update frequency: Every 30 seconds is usually enough. Every 5 seconds kills batteries and rarely adds value.
- Geofence sensitivity: Too tight triggers false alerts. Too loose misses actual issues. Start with 50-meter radius and adjust based on the site.
- Offline handling: Locations should queue when signal drops and sync when it returns. Test this in parking garages and basements.
Using Location Data Fairly
The biggest risk isn't the technology—it's how supervisors use it. Location data should be used for:
- Verifying patrol completion for client reports
- Dispatching the nearest officer to an incident
- Safety checks when an officer doesn't respond
- Identifying coverage gaps in patrol routes
It should not be used for:
- Catching people taking unauthorized breaks
- Second-guessing every minor route deviation
- Building cases for termination without other evidence
If your culture is punitive, location tracking will make it worse. Fix the culture first.
Rolling It Out
Key Takeaways
- Most GPS failures are human (culture), not technical
- Be transparent about what's tracked and why—in writing
- Use data for safety and accountability, not micromanagement
- Done right, location tracking builds trust—done wrong, it destroys it
Written by
TeamMapTeam
TeamMap builds modern workforce management tools for security teams, helping companies track, communicate, and coordinate their field operations.
Continue Reading
Video Analytics for Security: Beyond Basic Surveillance
AI-powered video analytics can detect intrusions, count people, and identify anomalies. This guide covers practical applications and integration strategies.
Security Robots: Are Autonomous Patrol Units Worth It?
From Knightscope to Boston Dynamics, security robots are entering the market. We examine capabilities, costs, and realistic use cases for physical security.
Drones in Security: Use Cases, Regulations, and ROI
Drones are transforming perimeter security and incident response. This guide covers practical applications, FAA regulations, and calculating return on investment.